We have several “network-to-network” L2TP w/IPSEC VPNs for the purpose of management (not end user traffic) and they present like any other link for the purposes of routing. If you only need to initiate connections from one end of the tunnel (I.e. from management stations to devices across the tunnel), you can simply masquerade it at the end that initiates the connections and all the management traffic will come from an IP known to the other network (if your VPN terminates at the other network’s gateway of last resort). If you need traffic to go both ways, initiated from either end, then you can turn on OSPF on both ends and just redistribute static from the static end. Of course, make sure there are. Overlapping prefixes.
________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of David McCullough via Mikrotik-users <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 7:28:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Site-to-Site VPN We are expanding into a new market, which will extend our service base. This new market currently has a fiber drain and we will be connecting these two markets onto a single network in the coming months. In the mean time we need to implement a site-to-site VPN so that we can monitor the new markets equipment, migrate to our DHCP server, etc. Both networks are utilizing MikroTik equipment. Our network is utilizing OSPF, while the new market just has static routes. We are looking at the various options to integrate the site-to-site VPN. We are thinking to implement L2TP. Will L2TP provide any routing? Will we need to enable GRE? Should we just add static routes, since it’s temporary. Thanks, David McCullough [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Hill Country Wireless & Technology 830.225.1465 (o) 830.309.0473 (c) www.hcwireless.com<http://www.hcwireless.com/>
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
