For allowing the customer to have the IP in their equipment versus the radio, is using straight WDS bridge mode still the best way?
Problem with that, is if you change channels.. you need to sign into every client radio and move them first. -Keith- ----- Original Message ----- From: Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed, 4/23/2008 10:07pm To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB OS v 3.7 On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Terri Kelley wrote: >Anyone had trouble with client to ap same version? I have heard >rumors that they wouldn't associate or pass traffic. While I have only one customer using 3.7 on both client and AP (that I know of), I have not seen this issue. Perhaps others have. >Also, anyone seen any problems with 3.x ap and a 2.9 client? I want >to start upgrading to take advantage of the pseudobridge. Well, I have not seen any issues here, either, but I can't think of anyone off hand that is doing this. As for the "advantage" in pseudobridge, the biggest REAL advantage is to find a way to build the network without it. I can't think of one GOOD reason to use this. Perhaps there are reasons...I just can't think of any. -- ******************************************************************** *Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation * *Network Engineering *MikroTik RouterOS * *573-276-2879 *ImageStream * *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE * *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Wired or Wireless Networks * ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
