Butch,
I thought that pseudobridge had better performance in p-t-multipoint.
On the Mikrotik forum, I noticed alot of complaining
about WDS performance dropping when you get over 5 or 6 WDS sessions on
an AP. Is this true?
Eric
//
Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Keith Barber wrote:
For allowing the customer to have the IP in their equipment versus
the radio, is using straight WDS bridge mode still the best way?
WDS is better than "psuedobridge". After all, if you can create a
"real" bridge, isn't that better than a "sort of" (psuedo) bridge?
There are other options, but if you need to create a bridge over
wireless, WDS is the lowest overhead option.
Problem with that, is if you change channels.. you need to sign
into every client radio and move them first.
Couple of things to remember. First, you don't have to run WDS at
every client just because one (or more) on an AP is running WDS.
Secondly, if you use mode "station-wds", the client will follow
frequency changes just like "normal" clients.
