What a nightmare if you have to register both the ap and all cpe units. Terri Kelley Network Engineer 254-697-6710
This email message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above, and may contain, together with any attachment(s), confidential information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying or distribution of this message and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. On May 23, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Taken from Randy Cosby on the Part 15 WISP list (including a later > correction): > > > > I read through the FCC filing as well. It's downright confusing. There > are actually two, one for the frequencies you specify, and one just > for > 3363.2-3363.2. Totally confusing. > > Ubiquiti's docs also say they are Part 90Y compliant... Um, that's the > 4.9 section :). > > So... The good news. To get my feet wet, I tried to register a > location > using the Ubiquiti card as the equipment, along with a panel 3.6 > antenna. I specified the 3658.2-3668.2 frequencies on the > application to > be safe. I got a call back from a rep at the FCC who said basically, > " I know that you probably pulled the frequencies off the ubiquiti > equipment filing, but you should instead put 3650-3675 (the restricted > band). If you will do that, we can get this approved." > > So I did. > > And it did. > > Now, I do have some questions still. Is 3650 ONLY for fixed and > mobile, > not PTMP? I know you have to register fixed stations (both sides) and > base stations. But if you're doing a typical AP / multiple CPE > setup, is > that considered fixed on both ends, or ?? > > The card will not work in laptops according to their own filing. > > https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms/blobs/retrieve.cgi?attachment_id=921421&native_or_pdf=pdf > > > ---------- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mikrotik discussions" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 6:52 AM > Subject: [Mikrotik] XR3 > > >> Does MT yet support the XR3? On another list, I heard that the FCC >> allows >> registration of the XR3. We just need something to put it in. >> >> >> ---------- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080523/e93f7a70/attachment.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080523/9e313285/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: LogoHzlsigtest.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2158 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080523/9e313285/attachment.jpg
