I am fine with leaving the current gear where it is at. MT Does not look to offer 3.30 for download still and I finely wore out my mt cd. All my RBs have been left at what ever came on them, so thats a mix of a dozen or so versions. I am not doing anything exotic with them so they have been fine. I am just wondering if I should go ahead and go with 4.17 or 5.2 for the new router or stick to 3.30. The old one was doing MLPPP on 4 lines with OSPF feeds. Script rebooted it once a week but I think that was a left over from 3.13ish days (what ever the first MLPPP supported version was with the memory bug)
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure I have some 3.30 running just fine. I have a couple 2.9.50 > and 51 that are almost just fine, too. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Jeromie Reeves <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I have left pretty much all my routers back at 3.30 because they have >> been stable in my uses. Is there any compelling >> fixes in 4.17/5.2?? >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110519/b44eb547/attachment.html> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
