I am doing v6 just fine with 3.30. In fact I think that is why I went from the first stable MLPPP version to 3.30.
What are people finding that 4/5 has for v6 that 3.30 does not? I also agree with 'if it works dont fix it' but that is not a option. A water leak has killed a number of my routers and servers in my rack. Seeking 3.30 all I found on the MT site was 4.17 and 5.2 Since I have to do a full new build any how, I was wondering if I should not just go with one of them. Most of my routers could be replaced with some RB's. I do not do much at this site, the MLPPP box will be going to 8 lines, but I figure I will use a vlan switch and bring them all in on 1 port. The NAT box will stay a x86 unit of some time most likely. The firewall and snort boxes will also stay x86, but I am thinking of combining them into a vmware unit. On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Scott Reed <[email protected]> wrote: > If you are anticipating IPv6, and we all should be, at sometime you will > want to get to 5.x. > > On 5/19/2011 11:46 AM, Robert Andrews wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The reason we went over was to get ready for IPV6. We do want to run 6 >> sometime in the near future. We do think that it will be a >> requirement. So better the devil you know... Otherwise it would >> definitely be "if it works, don't ...k with it" Like many things we >> trust old code more than new code. So far we have seen good results >> with 5.2 and we have not seen eroding memory. My speculation is that >> something the Dude is tickling is causing the SNMP memory erosion. Our >> nagios queries don't seem to be doing anything. >> >> Robert >> >> On 05/19/2011 08:32 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: >>> >>> I am fine with leaving the current gear where it is at. MT Does not >>> look to offer 3.30 for download still and I finely wore out my mt cd. >>> All my RBs >>> have been left at what ever came on them, so thats a mix of a dozen or >>> so versions. I am not doing anything exotic with them so they have >>> been fine. >>> I am just wondering if I should go ahead and go with 4.17 or 5.2 for >>> the new router or stick to 3.30. The old one was doing MLPPP on 4 >>> lines with OSPF >>> feeds. Script rebooted it once a week but I think that was a left over >>> from 3.13ish days (what ever the first MLPPP supported version was >>> with the memory >>> bug) >>> >>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Josh Luthman >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure I have some 3.30 running just fine. I have a couple >>>> 2.9.50 >>>> and 51 that are almost just fine, too. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Jeromie >>>> Reeves<[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have left pretty much all my routers back at 3.30 because they have >>>>> been stable in my uses. Is there any compelling >>>>> fixes in 4.17/5.2?? >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>> >>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>> RouterOS >>>>> >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> >>>> URL:<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110519/b44eb547/attachment.html> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>> >>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>> RouterOS >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>> >>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>> RouterOS >>> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN1TtIAAoJEC+8HUjSuDOs7gYH/RgXkR7+4RGa5NEOayTYGeI8 >> N2PAEJUyT640rC3uRDTJ46SIMInV2FytYQgN9qjR69yOm60638Tf02a3GMsADqri >> SWHuVM2zmKVsJYUQcqVuHKhrjHGYb3E8n7RY0yqKmte+9FK/JkR/hrZCjmGquLWZ >> BRRaKXSqFo7Po5lCafN375EV8dfg7aSuyxY6sKL8OTUciEET+wdizGlwxl5jzuRw >> PGu3IjVVY2DgxLwlr1ufkF3rTOcz9yOhCOfKL5nKsFhEjctUR0/9lFWYDO1WBeCi >> Emx2g6mIzWdMU/XGMC5BGH9T3DCvKgMVqy2BcOXzo+L5l4JjTAAbWVzKY3kUvVQ= >> =M4XH >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> > > -- > Scott Reed > Owner > NewWays Networking, LLC > Wireless Networking > Network Design, Installation and Administration > Mikrotik Advanced Certified > www.nwwnet.net > (765) 855-1060 > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
