Judging by how long it took to get from 5.0beta1 to 5.0 (about 1 year),
I would say that we might be seeing 6.0 around August of 2013.
Also, by the spacing between beta versions of 6 and current versions of
5, I would say we have almost seen our last 5.x version.
What's new in 6.0beta3 (2012-Aug-22 12:12):
What's new in 5.20 (2012-Aug-15 13:04):
What's new in 5.19 (2012-Jul-16 10:51):
What's new in 5.18 (2012-Jun-21 17:20):
What's new in 5.17 (2012-May-28 12:34):
What's new in 5.16 (2012-May-09 17:23):
What's new in 6.0beta2 (2012-Apr-24 10:57):
What's new in 5.15 (2012-Apr-20 13:11):
What's new in 6.0beta1 (2012-Apr-13 15:26):
What's new in 5.14 (2012-Feb-22 12:04):
What's new in 5.13 (2012-Feb-14 08:18):
What's new in 5.12 (2012-Jan-19 14:31):
What's new in 5.11 (2011-Dec-12 11:05):
What's new in 5.10 (2011-Dec-09 11:49):
What's new in 5.9 (2011-Nov-29 14:32):
What's new in 5.8 (2011-Nov-01 10:14):
What's new in 5.7 (2011-Sep-14 10:54):
What's new in 5.6 (2011-Aug-02 14:45):
What's new in 5.6:
What's new in 5.5 (2011-Jun-20 14:43):
What's new in 5.4 (2011-May-27 13:18):
What's new in 5.3 (2011-Apr-29 15:05):
What's new in 5.2 (2011-Apr-21 09:36):
What's new in 5.1 (2011-Apr-08 12:55):
What's new in 5.0 (2011-Mar-31 11:33):
What's new in 5.0rc11 (2011-Mar-04 14:29):
What's new in 5.0rc10 (2011-Feb-17 14:06):
What's new in 5.0rc9 (2011-Feb-09 13:57):
What's new in 5.0rc8 (2011-Feb-01 14:03):
What's new in 5.0rc7 (2010-Dec-29 10:39):
What's new in 5.0rc6 (2010-Dec-23 13:33):
What's new in 5.0rc5 (2010-Dec-01 07:47):
What's new in 5.0rc4 (2010-Nov-22 16:58):
What's new in 5.0rc3 (2010-Oct-29 09:02):
What's new in 5.0rc2 (2010-Oct-27 16:20):
What's new in 5.0rc1 (2010-Sep-17 13:58):
What's new in 5.0beta6 (2010-Aug-10 13:22):
What's new in 5.0beta5 (2010-Jul-23 14:50):
What's new in 5.0beta4 (2010-Jun-28 16:17):
What's new in 5.0beta3 (2010-Jun-17 13:46):
What's new in 5.0beta2 (2010-Apr-30 11:24):
What's new in 5.0beta1 (2010-Mar-31 09:17):
bp
On 8/27/2012 11:56 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:31 -0500, Rory McCann wrote:
I have an older version of Butch's QoS set up on this device.
The intel drivers in version 5 of ROS are a problem. While not a
"public" admission, Mikrotik made it clear that the buggy intel drivers
were replaced in version 6 of ROS with the kernel upgrade. Current
recommendations are that you don't run ANY queue trees on that hardware
if you will be moving over about 15-20 Meg of traffic. The newer
scripts work a little better, but the bug in the intel code seems to be
a combination of queues + anything > 15Meg of traffic. There may be
other times you'd see the bug, but this is one that I have battled for a
long time. FWIW, the issue doesn't exist in version 4 of ROS, but that
hardware required v5+.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120828/3166ee35/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
