If it will connect auto and not set, something is either wrong with one
of the ports or the cable. I think I would lean toward a port, but not
sure how to know which end.
On 3/19/2013 11:51 AM, Judd Howie wrote:
Many thanks for all the advise so far.
Shayne - will try your idea, sounds promising for a diagnosis step. Will
revert on this.
Scott - pretty much all good there, under speed test the board sits at
about 65% idle. FW uses about 10% and queues about 10%. Turning all rules
and queues results in a minimal speed improvement (a couple of meg only).
Sam - have played around a fair bit re auto, etc. On that interface, 10 and
100 with no auto negotiate come up fine but for some reason 1000 with no
auto just stops the interface from coming up. Cycling through 10/100/100
with auto on and off and testing each one , the best result so far is 1000
with auto negotiate (can't test without because interface just stays down).
I may swap out that cable tomorrow just to be safe and then recheck.
Again, thanks for all the pointers.
On 20 March 2013 02:23, Sam Tetherow <[email protected]> wrote:
Also be sure to set the interface between the Mikrotik and the Cisco to
1000-Full and turn off autonegotiate.
On 03/19/2013 09:44 AM, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
What happens if you leave the cisco in bridge mode, connect a computer
directly to it, and run your speed tests? The email says you've tested
the
cisco in L3 mode, and the cisco in L2 mode with a Mikrotik.
-----Original Message-----
From:
mikrotik-bounces@mail.**butchevans.com<[email protected]>
[mailto:mikrotik-bounces@mail.**butchevans.com<[email protected]>]
On Behalf Of Judd Howie
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:24
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: [Mikrotik] RB2011UAS-2HnD througput
I have recently purchased a RB2011UAS-2HnD (great little unit) to replace
a
RB433UAH that's a couple of years old.
My primary reason for replacing the 433 was that when I turned on web
proxy
(usb store onboard), my download speeds dropped drastically and CPU use
shot
through the roof.
The environment is a small home office with approximately 15 devices. The
routerboard sits behind a Cisco DPS3925 cable gateway in bridged mode. (
http://www.cisco.com/web/**consumer/support/modem_**DPC3925.html<http://www.cisco.com/web/consumer/support/modem_DPC3925.html>
)
When speed testing from behind the 433 and Cisco in bridged mode speeds
maxed at about 35Mb (pings fine at 6ms). If I took the MK out of the
equation and turned off bridged mode on the Cisco and tested again using
it
as the router, speeds came back to where they should be (110Mb). This is
all
in the exact same environment, only difference is MK/no MK.
I thought the new router would fix this but sadly I am seeing the exact
same
behaviour now. Hence my mail to the list.
Would greatly appreciate any thoughts on what might be the cause?
Both the 433 and the new RB2011 have near the exact same config. We are
talking about a lightly utilised connection. DNS and DHCP is on, a couple
of
wireless clients, web proxy off, connection tracking off, 5 or so simple
queues, regular set of simple firewall rules, one bridge and a couple of
PPP
client connections. Basically, as far as router config is concerned it's
doing about 5% of what it's capable of...sadly though it seems to not be
able to deliver anywhere need the speeds I see from the crappy little CPE
Cisco provided by my ISP.
I have several RB1100 and RB1200's in the wild all running fine and
delivering speeds as expected. I don't want to have to set one up home to
ensure I can see speeds I'm capable off but that may be my next option
unless the brains trust on the list can point me in the direction of a
solution?
Thanks in advance.
J
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/**
attachments/20130320/2251a74d<http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130320/2251a74d>
/attachment.html>
______________________________**_________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
______________________________**_________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
______________________________**_________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130320/6b30d6be/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6156 - Release Date: 03/08/13
Internal Virus Database is out of date.
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik Advanced Certified
www.nwwnet.net
(765) 855-1060
(765) 439-4253
(855) 231-6239
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
