Yes cable is a common denominator across the two routerboards so a definite
possibility. Will check it out and come back.

J











On 20 March 2013 06:28, Scott Reed <[email protected]> wrote:

> If it will connect auto and not set, something is either wrong with one of
> the ports or the cable.  I think I would lean toward a port, but not sure
> how to know which end.
>
> On 3/19/2013 11:51 AM, Judd Howie wrote:
>
>> Many thanks for all the advise so far.
>>
>> Shayne - will try your idea, sounds promising for a diagnosis step. Will
>> revert on this.
>>
>> Scott - pretty much all good there, under speed test the board sits at
>> about 65% idle. FW uses about 10% and queues about 10%. Turning all rules
>> and queues results in a minimal speed improvement (a couple of meg only).
>>
>> Sam - have played around a fair bit re auto, etc. On that interface, 10
>> and
>> 100 with no auto negotiate come up fine but for some reason 1000 with no
>> auto just stops the interface from coming up. Cycling through 10/100/100
>> with auto on and off and testing each one , the best result so far is 1000
>> with auto negotiate (can't test without because interface just stays
>> down).
>> I may swap out that cable tomorrow just to be safe and then recheck.
>>
>> Again, thanks for all the pointers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20 March 2013 02:23, Sam Tetherow <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Also be sure to set the interface between the Mikrotik and the Cisco to
>>> 1000-Full and turn off autonegotiate.
>>>
>>> On 03/19/2013 09:44 AM, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
>>>
>>>  What happens if you leave the cisco in bridge mode, connect a computer
>>>> directly to it, and run your speed tests?  The email says you've tested
>>>> the
>>>> cisco in L3 mode, and the cisco in L2 mode with a Mikrotik.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: mikrotik-bounces@mail.**butche**vans.com <http://butchevans.com><
>>>> mikrotik-bounces@**mail.butchevans.com<[email protected]>
>>>> >
>>>> [mailto:mikrotik-bounces@mail.****butchevans.com<mikrotik-**
>>>> [email protected] <[email protected]>>]
>>>> On Behalf Of Judd Howie
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:24
>>>> To: Mikrotik discussions
>>>> Subject: [Mikrotik] RB2011UAS-2HnD througput
>>>>
>>>> I have recently purchased a RB2011UAS-2HnD (great little unit) to
>>>> replace
>>>> a
>>>> RB433UAH that's a couple of years old.
>>>>
>>>> My primary reason for replacing the 433 was that when I turned on web
>>>> proxy
>>>> (usb store onboard), my download speeds dropped drastically and CPU use
>>>> shot
>>>> through the roof.
>>>> The environment is a small home office with approximately 15 devices.
>>>> The
>>>> routerboard sits behind a Cisco DPS3925 cable gateway in bridged mode. (
>>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/****consumer/support/modem_****DPC3925.html<http://www.cisco.com/web/**consumer/support/modem_**DPC3925.html>
>>>> <http://www.cisco.**com/web/consumer/support/**modem_DPC3925.html<http://www.cisco.com/web/consumer/support/modem_DPC3925.html>
>>>> >
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>> When speed testing from behind the 433 and Cisco in bridged mode speeds
>>>> maxed at about 35Mb (pings fine at 6ms). If I took the MK out of the
>>>> equation and turned off bridged mode on the Cisco and tested again using
>>>> it
>>>> as the router, speeds came back to where they should be (110Mb). This is
>>>> all
>>>> in the exact same environment, only difference is MK/no MK.
>>>> I thought the new router would fix this but sadly I am seeing the exact
>>>> same
>>>> behaviour now. Hence my mail to the list.
>>>> Would greatly appreciate any thoughts on what might be the cause?
>>>>
>>>> Both the 433 and the new RB2011 have near the exact same config. We are
>>>> talking about a lightly utilised connection. DNS and DHCP is on, a
>>>> couple
>>>> of
>>>> wireless clients, web proxy off,  connection tracking off, 5 or so
>>>> simple
>>>> queues, regular set of simple firewall rules, one bridge and a couple of
>>>> PPP
>>>> client connections. Basically, as far as router config is concerned it's
>>>> doing about 5% of what it's capable of...sadly though it seems to not be
>>>> able to deliver anywhere need the speeds I see from the crappy little
>>>> CPE
>>>> Cisco provided by my ISP.
>>>>
>>>> I have several RB1100 and RB1200's in the wild all running fine and
>>>> delivering speeds as expected. I don't want to have to set one up home
>>>> to
>>>> ensure I can see speeds I'm capable off but that may be my next option
>>>> unless the brains trust on the list can point me in the direction of a
>>>> solution?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> J
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:
>>>> <http://mail.butchevans.com/****pipermail/mikrotik/**<http://mail.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/**>
>>>> attachments/20130320/2251a74d<**http://mail.butchevans.com/**
>>>> pipermail/mikrotik/**attachments/20130320/2251a74d<http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130320/2251a74d>
>>>> >
>>>> /attachment.html>
>>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.butchevans.com/****mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>>> <http**://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>> RouterOS
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.butchevans.com/****mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>>> <http**://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>> RouterOS
>>>>
>>>>  ______________________________****_________________
>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.butchevans.com/****mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>> <http**://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>> >
>>>
>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>> RouterOS
>>>
>>>  -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://mail.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/**
>> attachments/20130320/6b30d6be/**attachment.html<http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130320/6b30d6be/attachment.html>
>> >
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Mikrotik mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>
>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> RouterOS
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6156 - Release Date: 03/08/13
>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Scott Reed
> Owner
> NewWays Networking, LLC
> Wireless Networking
> Network Design, Installation and Administration
>
>
> Mikrotik Advanced Certified
>  www.nwwnet.net
> (765) 855-1060
> (765) 439-4253
> (855) 231-6239
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Mikrotik mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
> RouterOS
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130320/0f34193b/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

Reply via email to