So in other words, it should work as expected.
I did fire it up, I just have no way to verify if my EoIP tunnel is
actually protected or not. I'm just assuming with the SA's in place, any
traffic going between the WAN IPs should match the policy and be covered??
Rory McCann
Minn-Kota Ag Products
P: 701-403-4877 | E: [email protected]
On 4/18/2013 4:38 PM, Stuart Howlette wrote:
I've done the exact same as described in the first email with no issues.
With PPTP I found a lot of issues, mainly with PPTP binding itself to an
interface and using it to forward. Even if a better route becomes
available, it only seems to reroute when the physical interface state
changes.
Also, PPTP encryption has been known to be weak for many years. At least
with IPSec you can set it to use stronger protocols like AES for encryption
and SHA for hashing.
Stuart
On 18 April 2013 22:27, Eric Tykwinski <[email protected]> wrote:
Here's Butch's example:
http://blog.butchevans.com/2008/09/mikrotik_routeros_transparent_bridge_pptp
_eoip/
Worked well for me transitioning servers and routers over from one DC to
another..
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130418/678e0616/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
