If you are concerned that the wireless link is fouling up the OSPF messages then you might try an EOIP tunnel between the routers. I haven't tried it but I have heard many people on this list recommend it as a fix.
-Ty On Feb 25, 2014 9:17 PM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks for the suggestions. Tried NBMA and that didn't work. I didn't > think I could have two OSPF networks on the same interface. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Prince > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 10:05 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1 > > A couple of thoughts Paul. > > If you suspect that broadcast traffic is maybe not making it on one of the > paths, you might try configuring them with NBMA. > > The other thought was why you don't configure each of the paths with a > /30, so that they are on distinctly different subnets? > > > bp > > On 2/25/2014 5:41 PM, Paul McCall wrote: > > I have run extensive tests under load and I cant find any Ethernet > errors while I am doing it, nor any ping losss from each Tik up the tower > to the radios. > > > > I will find it.. I know... but it actually seems logical on why it would > not know where to route to since both destinations are on the same OSPF > network > > > > Paul > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Terri Kelley > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:38 PM > > To: Mikrotik discussions > > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1 > > > > Doesn't sound right then. I'm running it through several different > versions of M5s with no issues. They are set to bridge with 750gl doing the > ospf. The RJ45 that I talked about was on the cat 5 from the bridge > Plugging into the 750. Not sure what else to tell you > > > > Terri Kelley > > Network Engineer > > 254.697.6710 > > Farm to Market Broadband > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul McCall <[email protected]> > > To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 7:32 PM > > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1 > > > > Terry, I tried PTP mode. It wouldn't stay "up" on that OSPF leg. > > > > Paul > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Terri Kelley > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:16 PM > > To: Mikrotik discussions > > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1 > > > > So a couple of things. Doesn't matter what you put in as a static, ospf > will still choose it's own so you may see both. Static should take priority > though. You may want to make the wireless connections point to point in > ospf rather than broadcast. Seems to be more stable for me. I kept seeing > it lose the ospf one direction then sometime later it would come back. And > finally in my case mine would change even though I thought it shouldn't. > Then I noticed there were some speed issues under load. Turns out an rj45 > wasnt on good. That settled the whole thing. > > > > Terri Kelley > > Network Engineer > > 254.697.6710 > > Farm to Market Broadband > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul McCall <[email protected]> > > To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 6:38 PM > > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1 > > > > Costs are all set right, both incoming and outgoing. The problem is > that the TIK does not seem to differentiate between the two towers that it > could possibly go to because they are on the same subnet and same OSPF > network. That's the problem, in a nutshell > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Reed > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:21 AM > > To: Mikrotik discussions > > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1 > > > > Not sure what you have setup, but a couple of things come to mind. > > A router ID on any router of 0.0.0.0 will cause funny things to happen > occasionally. Make sure all routers have an unique ID. > > Routes with equal costs will sometimes change. Make sure you have the > costs setup correctly on the routers. Make sure the cost is the same for > both directions on a link unless you really do want traffic to use a > different path inbound than outbound. > > More specific routes have priority over more general routes. Not > everything takes the default route, if there are other ways to get > somewhere. > > There have been some issues with some levels of UBNT firmware. If you > are a WISPA member, check the archives on the mail lists. (If you aren't a > WISPA member, get signed up as soon as you can.) If you want help offlist, > feel free to e-mail me directly. > > > > On 2/24/2014 2:34 PM, Paul McCall wrote: > >> Tower A has a Rocket M5 feeding Tower B (as its primary OSPF path) and > >> Tower C (as its secondary OSPF Path and that works correctly) > >> > >> Seemingly since A (xxx.xxx.214.49), B (xxx.xxx.214.50) and C > (xxx.xxx.214.51) are on the same subnet and the same OSPF network, > sometimes Tower B will go through Tower C before going to Tower A. > >> > >> Even with a static route from B (214.50) to A (214.49), the OSPF > default route wants to prefer the tower C (214.51) path. In the IP, Route > List it shows that the default should go the right direction with a > "distance" of 1. In the OSPF, Routes it shows Tower C (214.51) as the > default path with a cost of 1 and a state of Ext 2. > >> > >> Any thoughts ? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Paul McCall, Pres. > >> PDMNet / Florida Broadband > >> 658 Old Dixie Highway > >> Vero Beach, FL 32962 > >> 772-564-6800 office > >> 772-473-0352 cell > >> www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com/> > >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was > >> scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> <http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140224/67 > >> e85431/attachment.html> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mikrotik mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > >> > >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > >> RouterOS > >> > >> > >> ----- > >> No virus found in this message. > >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > >> Version: 2014.0.4335 / Virus Database: 3705/7120 - Release Date: > >> 02/24/14 > >> > >> > > -- > > Scott Reed > > Owner > > NewWays Networking, LLC > > Wireless Networking > > Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced > Certified www.nwwnet.net > > (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mikrotik mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS _______________________________________________ > > Mikrotik mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140225/43634dd7/attachment.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mikrotik mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS _______________________________________________ > > Mikrotik mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140225/5409579a/attachment.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mikrotik mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > > _______________________________________________ > > Mikrotik mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140225/f924ab1f/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
