> Hi, > > I just want to know how you guys/gals deal with > filter_bad_filename() versus virus scanning. > > Right now, my filter scans the parcel first > for bad_filename and then the virusscanner > hits it(I think it does at least). Is this > the 'correct' (general way) of doing things?
Correct, probably, I look at this this way. It is the default filter setup, and people have said over and over that why bother spending cpu cycles scanning for infections when something thats already deemed a bad filename. I forget the link to MS, I think its on the MD faq tho, where MS claims that these default types are bad and should be a security risk. It did afterall come from the horses mouth. Kayne _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
