Edmund said: > if M$ says the attachment extensions are dangerous, *who's* > to argue with them? *grin* Seriously though, I suppose I'll > just let it be for now.
I still reject all the default attachment types after virus scanning. For faster performance you should obviously do it in this order: reject on bad attachments, file::scan, (clamd, or clamdscan). Luke Computer Science System Administrator _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
