If it were my choice, I would increase the RAM as much as possible, use 3ware SATA RAID and RAM disks for MIMEDefang processing. Also, I would try and go for a Dual CPU Xeon before going to two boxes to avoid the excess administrivia.
The bottleneck is typically your internet connection as MD is lightning fast without the network tests enabled. Define: Extremely Heavy Load in terms of how many emails per day avg. Regards, KAM > I'm assembling several front-end MIMEDefang filter servers. These > machines will be used to filter incoming email and pass it along to our > mailstore. They will be under extremely heavy load. I'm wondering how > I/O intensive the Sendmail/MIMEDefang combination is in a setup like > this. I would also be using File::Scan and clamd. > > Could I get by with SATA drives, or should I go all out and get the 15K > SCSI models? If I skimp on the drives I might be able to get a second > whole machine. When used in this configuration, will CPU, memory, or > I/O be the bottleneck? _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
