I'm even willing to try Reiser4. Anybody tested this with MIMEDefang? It supposed to be about twice as fast at everything except deleting, but it also uses twice as much CPU.
--Aaron
Lucas Albers wrote:
Andrew J Caird said:
email), but several small, fast disks would serve you well. The ideal situation (well, in my opinion) is: one disk for OS and logs; one disk for /var/spool/mqueue; one disk for the MD quarantine; enough RAM for a RAMdisk for MD's working directory. If these servers will handle outgoing email, you'll need a bigger mqueue, probably. If you have multiple controllers, you can put either mqueue or the MD quarantine on its own controller.
I read somewhere that reiserfs is faster then ext3 on small file deletion/creation. Typical mail load. On a high load site, would type of file system really matter?
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
