Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/15/2004 06:11:14 > PM: > > > I read somewhere that reiserfs is faster then ext3 on small file > > deletion/creation. Typical mail load. > > On a high load site, would type of file system really matter? > > The testing in "sendmail Performance Tuning" indicates that ext3 is > faster. Even ext2 is faster than Reiser. See section 3.3.3, pgs. 42-43.
I can't say enough about this book, it's very dense, but worth reading a couple of times. Anyone running high-performance email systems would be well served by reading it. The other thing to keep in mind is that there is more to filesystems than speed when it comes to email - they also have to be reliable and be able to insure message storage. Of course, for MD's temp space the opposite is true - message persistance (beyond a few seconds) isn't important and speed is all that matters. See Christenson's book for a more educated discussion of these issues. -- Andrew Caird _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
