Hi,
Does anyone use File::Scan with MIMEDefang? It seems to cause a lot of problems with false positives.
For the next release, I'm considering removing the auto-detection of File::Scan. In other words, if you want File::Scan, you'll have to specifically ask for it in your filter.
Any objections to this change?
Regards,
David.
I used to use File::Scan on the office mail servers but I got complaints about false positives. I've since switched to ClamAV.
I still use a combination of File::Scan and ClamAV on my personal mail server (where I can be more strict about what types of files are accepted as attachments).
I think the change would be good, because up until now, if File::Scan is installed, it's used. I could see a case where it may be installed but not desired to be used.
alan _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
