Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It might make sense to be philosophical about whether or not > to do something, but you've already decided that a bounce > is going to be constructed and at this point the only > quibbling is about who is going to do the work.
It may be not significant when dealing with legitimate mail (but I still think the closer to the original sender DSN notifications are generated the better), but we are dealing with something recognized as spam here. There is a high probability that the sender's address is invalid, and sending any mail there will result in another bounce/non-delivery message/mail stuck in the queue/whatever. That work should be done by the spammer's server (if any), not the spam victim's server. MJ _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
