David F. Skoll wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm using a recent version of sendmail (8.13.1) which supports
>> smfi_insheader.
>
>> Is it possible to configure MIMEDefang to use smfi_insheader instead
>> of smfi_addheader?
>
> Not currently; patches are welcome!
Patch attached -- if smfi_insheader is available at compile time, MIMEDefang
will use it to add headers instead of smfi_addheader.
I test whether smfi_insheader is available by checking whether SMFIR_INSHEADER
is defined.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
--- mimedefang.c.original 2005-12-20 09:57:27.000000000 -0800
+++ mimedefang.c 2005-12-20 10:17:21.000000000 -0800
@@ -1401,7 +1401,14 @@
if (hdr && val) {
percent_decode((unsigned char *) hdr);
percent_decode((unsigned char *) val);
+/* Insert headers at the top if we can */
+#ifdef SMFIR_INSHEADER
+ MD_SMFI_TRY(smfi_insheader, (ctx, 0, hdr, val));
+
+#else
+/* If not, add them at the bottom */
MD_SMFI_TRY(smfi_addheader, (ctx, hdr, val));
+#endif
}
break;
@@ -1472,9 +1479,19 @@
if (data->myip) {
snprintf(buffer, SMALLBUF, "%s on %s", scan_body, data->myip);
buffer[SMALLBUF-1] = 0;
+/* Insert headers at the top if we can */
+#ifdef SMFIR_INSHEADER
+ MD_SMFI_TRY(smfi_insheader, (ctx, 0, "X-Scanned-By", buffer));
+#else
MD_SMFI_TRY(smfi_addheader, (ctx, "X-Scanned-By", buffer));
+#endif
} else {
+/* Insert headers at the top if we can */
+#ifdef SMFIR_INSHEADER
+ MD_SMFI_TRY(smfi_insheader, (ctx, 0, "X-Scanned-By", scan_body));
+#else
MD_SMFI_TRY(smfi_addheader, (ctx, "X-Scanned-By", scan_body));
+#endif
}
}
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
