Hi, Matthew. > I suppose, then, I'll need a new RESULTS command.
Yes. > Does the X-Scanned-By header need to go at the bottom? That doesn't > get processed by the RESULTS command. I don't really care; I guess we can leave the X-Scanned-By: header alone. People who absolutely want it inserted at the top can suppress it with the -X option and then add it in using some Perl code. > If so, I'll use "N" for "N"ew header Sounds great! A lot of the code for action_insert_header will be the same as for action_add_header, so there's opportunity for refactoring there. If you want to make a first-pass at it, I will take a look and clean it up if necessary. One annoying issue is that I can't see a way to feed back to the Perl code whether or not action_insert_header is even available. We have no way from Perl to query the milter capabilities or milter version. :-( Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
