Kevin A. McGrail wrote:

All I can really say is welcome to the world of dictionary attacks. This is par for the course for most of I think on the list.

It's not so much a dictionary attack, at least not to me. They're all coming to recipients that resemble a message ID, as opposed to some name like some viruses use. Like, the message SENDER is [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED], and try to deliver TO [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is of course invalid.

I see dictionary attacks as messages that come from one address/one IP, targeting a random name at our domain. This one is slightly different. They also come from different IP addresses, so blocking that sender's IP doesn't have a whole lot of effect because 2 seconds later it'll be coming from a different one. On the other hand, using sendmail's access control, I can at least block anything that has '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' as the sender, regardless of where it's coming from. Granted, there may actually BE a legitimate user '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'...too bad I say.

Now, if it falls in the same category (a dictionary attack), that's a different story. :)

--
H | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   .   303.442.6410 x130
 IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith             .     800.441.3873 x130
 Photo Craft Imaging                       .     3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to