--On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:12 PM -0500 "David F. Skoll"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ooh! You're onto something! Allowing only strictly-validated HTML
would have the same effect as disallowing HTML altogether, but would
be far easier to justify to the PHBs as a
security/compliance/standards/pick_your_buzzword issue...
I'm not religiously opposed to HTML, if its ability to carry spam and
viruses is neutered. (That includes rejecting the same material rejected by
most web forums.)
So does anyone know of a good plug-in validator that can be dropped into MD
relatively painlessly? I know the W3C online validator has been released
for local website deployment (to validate private web pages).
<http://validator.w3.org/source/>
Other validators:
<http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/>
<http://valet.webthing.com/page/>
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
