Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Also 192.168.X.X is fine if the MX records also contains internet > accessible addresses. So:
> munged.com IN MX 25 [legit ip] > munged.com IN MX 10 [privatized ip] I disagree. If you publish a 192.168.x.x record as a public MX, you have no idea where your mail will go. What happens if on Customer X's network, someone sets up a malicious server at 192.168.x.x that intercepts all outgoing mail and replaces it with inflammatory mail? IMO, any domain that publishes *any* bogus MX record should be rejected. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
