Kenneth Porter wrote: > What's the penetration now for mail clients that send in UTF-8? Will the > elephant in the corner (Exchange, OE) do that? Or does it insist on > sending in "legacy" charsets like 1251? Not that I'm sure universal > UTF-8 (with no errors) will help, but it's one less complication in the > format, and lack of it might eventually become a strong spam sign.
Except UTF-8 penalizes those character sets that need two, three, ... bytes to encode many of their characters. For this reason, I expect all the weird and wonderful legacy encodings to survive. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
