--On Friday, April 17, 2009 9:34 PM -0400 "David F. Skoll"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Except UTF-8 penalizes those character sets that need two, three, ...
bytes to encode many of their characters. For this reason, I expect all
the weird and wonderful legacy encodings to survive.
Given that we have to suffer the proliferation of bad (ie. verbose) HTML in
email, is tripling the size of the payload that high a cost? (It might be
interesting to see how much no-op HTML markup is in the average message.)
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
