Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Actually, I found the vacation program to be woefully problematic in > replying to spam, lists, etc.
Ah. Well, we stop our spam at the server, so vacation(1) never sees it. I can see it would be a big problem if you run a tagging-only spam filter. AFAIK, vacation(1) already has protection against your specs #2-#7: > #2 Do not reply to message of "precedence of bulk" > #3 Do not reply to mailing lists. > #4 Do not reply to NDR and DSN messages. > #5 Do not reply to more than one time per day. > #6 Do not reply to Vacation and other out of office messages. > #7 Do not reply to Daemons Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
