On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:03:38 +0200 Michiel Brandenburg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh I realize that we are already polling for the socket to become > available 50 times waiting for 3 sec between polls. This is good as > the socket does probably come late. What I wanted to ask if it's > important that we actually have this socket after waiting for 2.5 min. Hmm, I see your point. I guess it makes more sense for mimedefang to exit with a failure exit status. I have a patch that makes the child process report back to the parent that mimedefang is ready, so it's easy enough to modify it to report failure and exit if the multiplexor socket fails to appear. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
