--- On Mon, 5/6/13, Les Mikesell <[email protected]> wrote: > How so, when they add setup and processing effort and don't add value? > It is the content that determines whether I think something is spam > or want to read it, not the mechanics of how the message was sent or > the forwarding path (which I may have set up myself).
So you claim that message forgery isn't a problem? Get a clue. I agree that spaminess and source authentication are separate issues, but most recipients don't want forged messages either, spam or not. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
