--- On Tue, 5/7/13, Les Mikesell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:12 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > > Under your theory, an MTA should pass on messages > containing e-mail virii too, so the user can determine it > (or get infected for the not-so-savvy users). This > latter point I clearly disagree with. > > This sort-of depends on the level of confidence you have in your > scanning tools. I don't think anyone wants to receive virii, although > an end user should have equal quality antivirus protection anyway. In > any case if you reject with an appropriate reason you have fulfilled a > mailer's obligations.
Your theory doesn't permit you to have it both ways. Since you seem to agree that rejecting virus content at the systemwide level is appropriate, I find your notion of letting the end user decide everything to be nonsense. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
