Re: Performance - some interesting results

[peter royal]

On May 2, 2006, at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are using the throughput collector too, but I did not look at the ergonomics (i.e. specifying criteria). I'll give it a shot and see how it performs. In your application, how did you find it performed? What size of eden did it settle on? I'm not measuring the eden space specifically, just total heap, but I will add a counter for that.  I've given it a max pause time of 80ms, and for a 90 minute test runs, all collections were under 100ms. However, once I go past the performance limit of the application (sending requests faster than I can process them, I do get 2-3 GC spikes of 1.1 to 1.4 seconds before my test ends). I did test with other GC's, and throughput with the max pause gave me the best performance. -pete --  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature