Re: Adding class types to encoder??

[peter royal]

On Jun 29, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Samuel Doyle wrote:

Any way I can make it so that I don't have to add every specific instance of a message I want to encode to the types list in my encoder?

I would basically just like a base class and have that as the only type in my encoder types.

Sorry for the delay, I was traveling back to NYC from Dublin :)

You're using the DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory?



-pete


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi

I'd recommend just making your own factory that has the logic that you want.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature