Re: Adding class types to encoder??

[peter royal]

On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Trustin Lee wrote:

On 7/4/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Jun 29, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Samuel Doyle wrote:
> Any way I can make it so that I don't have to add every specific
> instance of a message I want to encode to the types list in my
> encoder?
>
> I would basically just like a base class and have that as the only
> type in my encoder types.

Sorry for the delay, I was traveling back to NYC from Dublin :)

You're using the DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory?

I'd recommend just making your own factory that has the logic that
you want.

I think we can do this using the reflection API climbing up the class

hierarchy and interface list. Of course, there will be overhead of extra memory allocation because backtracking algorithm should be used for it. I can implement it very easily though because I have an experience about it.

-pete


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi

You can probably just compute that once when adding the mapping to save time @ runtime.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature