Re: having all MINA threads created from the Executor

[peter royal]

On Sep 10, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:

On 9/11/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

now that we have a generic Executor in MINA that we can use to
execute tasks, I'd like to use it as the launching mechanism for all
the threads that MINA creates. Any objections?

in this case?

Can you list some examples? Executor is for execution of tasks, but some of our threads runs as long as the JVM dies. Can executor pattern work even

-pete


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi

All of the Worker threads. Executor pattern still works, since it just takes a Runnable and handles them. (It does not impose any restrictions on task execution length) Paul Hammant is having me help him do a MINA transport for http:// xircles.codehaus.org/projects/jremoting, and asked if it were possible for all MINA threads that were created to be put into a thread pool owned by what is containing MINA. As it stands now, all threads but the Worker threads can be moved. The change would basically be to replace new Thread() with a submission to the Executor.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature