On 9/11/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 10, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Trustin Lee wrote: > On 9/11/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> now that we have a generic Executor in MINA that we can use to >> execute tasks, I'd like to use it as the launching mechanism for all >> the threads that MINA creates. Any objections? > > > Can you list some examples? Executor is for execution of tasks, > but some > of our threads runs as long as the JVM dies. Can executor pattern > work even > in this case? All of the Worker threads. Executor pattern still works, since it just takes a Runnable and handles them. (It does not impose any restrictions on task execution length) Paul Hammant is having me help him do a MINA transport for http:// xircles.codehaus.org/projects/jremoting, and asked if it were possible for all MINA threads that were created to be put into a thread pool owned by what is containing MINA. As it stands now, all threads but the Worker threads can be moved. The change would basically be to replace new Thread() with a submission to the Executor.
Sonds good. Go ahead! :) Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
