Re: Using Java5 concurrent if available

[peter royal]

On Sep 25, 2006, at 8:21 AM, James Im wrote:

peter royal wrote:

my view is that anyone that /needs/ java5 and no backport stuff now can

do this, otherwise wait for 1.1 :)

be probably out by then.

and for 1.1 why not go for Java6 directly (skipping Java5)? Java6 will

Are there substantial java6-only constructs that we'd want to use?

-pete


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature