On 18/10/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congratulations for the incubation, and I wish you good luck. I hope we collaborate closely on MINA.
Thank you. I certainly hope that some of our performance work can feed into MINA. We are doing another cycle of performance tests at the moment.
That's exciting. Can we adopt the code after we move to Java 5? We will move to Java 5 soon.
Sure. In fact the current code would work fine with the backport too.
Why don't you create a demultiplexing IoFilter which decorates a thread pool filter? The filter could make the messages with higher priority bypass the thread pool. Otherwise, you could have two thread pool filters in it and choose which pool to use, although it doesn't guarentee the thread safety at all.
Yes, we could certainly do it in a separate filter. It just seemed simpler when writing our pool to make it decide what gets added to the session event queue. RG
