On 10/29/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2006, at 6:05 AM, Trustin Lee wrote: > MINA is going to move to Java 5, and thus its major > version number should be 2 ( i.e. 2.0.0), but we can't go to 2.0 > because the > minor version number 0 means 'stable'. So we are talking about > using the > version number 1.5 or 1.9, but I think it's very weird because > we've changed > our platform. > > WDYT? I'm fine with not disturbing the even/odd thing, and would prefer not to. 1.1 is the next development version. It can be 2.0 when its released. Anything wrong with that?
I think 1.1 can't become 2.0 logically. 2.1 could be 2.2 though. The issue I'm raising is that we don't have a way to express the state before 2.0. The compromise is to use 1.5 or something similar, but is it the best way? We can just live with the current versioning scheme and call new MINA 1.5, but we could create much better scheme that everyone can see at one glance. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
