On Oct 28, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
I think 1.1 can't become 2.0 logically.
why not? its just a number :)
The issue I'm raising is that we don't have a way to express the state before 2.0.
sure, its any odd number < 2.0 :)
The compromise is to use 1.5 or something similar, but is it the best way?
i think so.version numbers are really arbitrary, and can descend into a total bike-shed discussion. what we have works.. and if we can help perceptions by picking an odd version that's > 1.1 for the next dev release, that's fine with me.
for another point of reference, lucene had a stable 1.4, did a 1.9 development release, then released 2.0. basically same as we're proposing, except s/1.9/1.5/.
-pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
