+1 On 10/30/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 On 10/31/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > is there interest in an official mina 1.0 build not requiring the > util.concurrent backport? > > this would be slightly more than what can be done by whacking the > backport import prefixes.. all data structures that have replacements > in j.u.concurrent will be removed and replaced with their jdk-based > counterparts. > > aside from Apache DS using MINA, I get the impression that pretty > much everyone else is on java5? > > -pete > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi > > > > > > -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
