On 10/31/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is there interest in an official mina 1.0 build not requiring the util.concurrent backport?
+1 Regards, Vinod.
- mina 1.0 and java5 peter royal
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Hanson Char
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Trustin Lee
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Greg Duffy
- RE: mina 1.0 and java5 Irving, Dave
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Mike Grundvig
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Vinod Panicker
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Emmanuel Lecharny
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Julien Vermillard
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Maarten Bosteels
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Trustin Lee
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Jeroen Brattinga
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 Alex Karasulu
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 peter royal
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 sishen
- Re: mina 1.0 and java5 peter royal
- RE: mina 1.0 and java5 Hieu Phan Thanh
