+1 Thanks & best regards, Hieu Phan.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Grundvig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:46 PM > To: mina-dev@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: mina 1.0 and java5 > > +1 > > Michael Grundvig > Electrotank, Inc > http://www.electrotank.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "peter royal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <mina-dev@directory.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:55 PM > Subject: mina 1.0 and java5 > > > > is there interest in an official mina 1.0 build not requiring the > > util.concurrent backport? > > > > this would be slightly more than what can be done by whacking the > > backport import prefixes.. all data structures that have replacements > > in j.u.concurrent will be removed and replaced with their jdk-based > > counterparts. > > > > aside from Apache DS using MINA, I get the impression that pretty > > much everyone else is on java5? > > > > -pete > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi > > > > > > > > >
