Harking back to what I said in another thread about choice and
interest in the selection of "appropriate evidence" I would imagine
that much of this stuff is likely to be highly biased in selection.
One wonders how he defines non-religious for his comparisons.
One wonders if the study tends to define a religious person as one who
is s regular church goer, or dedicated observer of his/her religion,
in which case the study would be choosing people with self-control: a
self fulfilling prediction.
Did the study acknowledge the fact that there is a higher percentage
of the religious in prisons than in the general population? Are cons
achievers who exhibit self-control?
8 decades of selection. Probably not worth the paper it is printed on.



On Jan 1, 8:36 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I found the following (I've cut it down) and think it may be of
> interest.
> Self-control is critical for success in life. University of Miami
> professor of Psychology Michael McCullough finds that religious people
> have more self-control than do their less religious counterparts.
> These findings imply that religious people may be better at pursuing
> and achieving long-term goals that are important to them and their
> religious groups. This, in turn, might help explain why religious
> people tend to have lower rates of substance abuse, better school
> achievement, less delinquency, better health behaviours, less
> depression, and longer lives.
> McCullough evaluated 8 decades worth of research on religion, which
> has been conducted in diverse samples of people from around the world.
> He found persuasive evidence from a variety of domains within the
> social sciences, including neuroscience, economics, psychology, and
> sociology, that religious beliefs and religious behaviours are capable
> of encouraging people to exercise self-control and to more effectively
> regulate their emotions and behaviours, so that they can pursue valued
> goals. The research paper will be published in the January 2009 issue
> of Psychological Bulletin.
> The importance of self-control and self-regulation for understanding
> human behaviour are well known to social scientists, but the
> possibility that the links of religiosity to self-control might
> explain the links of religiosity to health and behaviour has not
> received much explicit attention. Among the most interesting
> conclusions that the research team drew were the following:
> •     Religious rituals such as prayer and meditation affect the parts of
> the human brain that are most important for self-regulation and self-
> control;
> •     When people view their goals as "sacred," they put more energy and
> effort into pursuing those goals, and therefore, are probably more
> effective at attaining them;
> •     Religious lifestyles may contribute to self-control by providing
> people with clear standards for their behaviour, by causing people to
> monitor their own behaviour more closely, and by giving people the
> sense that God is watching their behaviour;
> •     The fact that religious people tend to be higher in self-control
> helps explain why religious people are less likely to misuse drugs and
> alcohol and experience problems with crime and delinquency.
> The question is essentially how the same social force that motivates
> acts of charity and generosity can also motivate people to strap bomb
> belts around their waists and then blow themselves up in crowded city
> buses.  By thinking of religion as a social force that provides people
> with resources for controlling their impulses (including the impulse
> for self-preservation, in some cases) in the service of higher goals,
> religion can motivate people to do just about anything.
>
> There are some obvious critiques, yet I feel something important lies
> in this.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to