As valuable as skepticism can be, as Neil has said elsewhere,
deconstruction can be used to the point of nihilism. And, the
selection of such a methodology along with using it as an ontological
foundation in this context results in ignorance.

It may appear to be a preferable way of approaching reality. Then
again, to many, common hedonism is seen as a virtue.



On Jan 1, 1:08 pm, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Harking back to what I said in another thread about choice and
> interest in the selection of "appropriate evidence" I would imagine
> that much of this stuff is likely to be highly biased in selection.
> One wonders how he defines non-religious for his comparisons.
> One wonders if the study tends to define a religious person as one who
> is s regular church goer, or dedicated observer of his/her religion,
> in which case the study would be choosing people with self-control: a
> self fulfilling prediction.
> Did the study acknowledge the fact that there is a higher percentage
> of the religious in prisons than in the general population? Are cons
> achievers who exhibit self-control?
> 8 decades of selection. Probably not worth the paper it is printed on.
>
> On Jan 1, 8:36 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I found the following (I've cut it down) and think it may be of
> > interest.
> > Self-control is critical for success in life. University of Miami
> > professor of Psychology Michael McCullough finds that religious people
> > have more self-control than do their less religious counterparts.
> > These findings imply that religious people may be better at pursuing
> > and achieving long-term goals that are important to them and their
> > religious groups. This, in turn, might help explain why religious
> > people tend to have lower rates of substance abuse, better school
> > achievement, less delinquency, better health behaviours, less
> > depression, and longer lives.
> > McCullough evaluated 8 decades worth of research on religion, which
> > has been conducted in diverse samples of people from around the world.
> > He found persuasive evidence from a variety of domains within the
> > social sciences, including neuroscience, economics, psychology, and
> > sociology, that religious beliefs and religious behaviours are capable
> > of encouraging people to exercise self-control and to more effectively
> > regulate their emotions and behaviours, so that they can pursue valued
> > goals. The research paper will be published in the January 2009 issue
> > of Psychological Bulletin.
> > The importance of self-control and self-regulation for understanding
> > human behaviour are well known to social scientists, but the
> > possibility that the links of religiosity to self-control might
> > explain the links of religiosity to health and behaviour has not
> > received much explicit attention. Among the most interesting
> > conclusions that the research team drew were the following:
> > •     Religious rituals such as prayer and meditation affect the parts of
> > the human brain that are most important for self-regulation and self-
> > control;
> > •     When people view their goals as "sacred," they put more energy and
> > effort into pursuing those goals, and therefore, are probably more
> > effective at attaining them;
> > •     Religious lifestyles may contribute to self-control by providing
> > people with clear standards for their behaviour, by causing people to
> > monitor their own behaviour more closely, and by giving people the
> > sense that God is watching their behaviour;
> > •     The fact that religious people tend to be higher in self-control
> > helps explain why religious people are less likely to misuse drugs and
> > alcohol and experience problems with crime and delinquency.
> > The question is essentially how the same social force that motivates
> > acts of charity and generosity can also motivate people to strap bomb
> > belts around their waists and then blow themselves up in crowded city
> > buses.  By thinking of religion as a social force that provides people
> > with resources for controlling their impulses (including the impulse
> > for self-preservation, in some cases) in the service of higher goals,
> > religion can motivate people to do just about anything.
>
> > There are some obvious critiques, yet I feel something important lies
> > in this.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to