Without meaning to take an apparently opposing view, I would agree
that philosophy will need to be brought ‘up to date’ when/if humans
learn the true nature of everything and/or how to not die.

On Jan 3, 11:49 am, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well as for literature, Homer may have been the greatest for hundreds
> of years but he was surpassed. Shakespeare is damn hard to beat and I
> don't think either Doyle or Dickens have managed to do it. Doyle, in
> particular is populist by comparison. The point is that Shakey, as a
> contemporary did do better than Homer as a person of the past, so it
> is possible that history may well find a new literary genius.
>
> As for philosophy there is a thread of progress (ugh! I hear you say).
> Really, Plato's time is over and although we may still rely on him for
> things he was the first to say, most of his work is no longer useful
> or relevant. None of the philosophers "outclass" contemporary
> philosophers as they no longer have the power to respond to up to date
> issues.
>
> On Dec 31 2008, 4:06 am, Archetypal Columnist <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The prolific writers Charles Dickens,Sir Conan Doyle,Shakespeare and
> > whatnot is exquisitely intellectual in their enterprise,which,we,the
> > contemporary humanity is revering them of their optimal repertoire.
>
> > Confucius,Lao Tzu,Homer,the philosophers,had outclass us in light of
> > ethics and morals which we hitherto assimilate them.I perceive I am
> > marginally inferior,like having penury and being destitue.
> > Vying with the past is apparently downright inimitable.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to