The American scholar Jackson had much to say about inaccuracies in Heidegger, particularly his pompous and poor Greek.. The questions do not spin off into miserable relativism, but a deeper question about how we might better believe what we know - and my guess is this has to do with social justice and a move towards getting pleasure in doing things for others and comfort in this identity or moral core. The qualification on these matters is breathing, as Vam well knows and asserts.
On 1 Feb, 03:52, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, and when you get to where that road take you, > be sure to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE > > dj > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:09 AM, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Paul: > > I am "diametrically opposed" epistemologically to the Phenomenalist > > position. Nice to meet you, however.... > > "Does Merleau-Ponty 'fill in the gaps' that Heidegger left?".... Blind > > leading the Blind.... > > " Do Foucault or Derrida give you a path out of modern anxiety? > > ".....Follow the Yellow Brick Road..... > > > nominal9 > > > On Jan 30, 6:36 am, Paul Grieg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is one of my favourite philosophy interviews: > > >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaGk6S1qhz0&feature=related > > >> Can any of you answer these questions: > > >> Does Merleau-Ponty 'fill in the gaps' that Heidegger left? > > >> Do Foucault or Derrida give you a path out of modern anxiety? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
