Ahhh then we are in agreement! ;¬)
On 9 Feb, 23:03, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not berating at all but simply responding out of my own
> interpretation of your posts. It's not the first thread in which we've
> encountered obtuse mindsets and I'm not the only one that has
> interpretive difficulty concerning some of your posts. This is not to
> devalue your posts in anyway but primarily for the sake of amiable
> dialogue conducive to meaningful debate we should at least examine
> what seems rift like on the surface. We may in fact, as a group,
> mostly agree, however the semantic curtain obscures that path of
> agreement.
>
> On Feb 9, 12:16 pm, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey SD,
>
> > > > Let me clarify my points for you.
>
> > > > When I say I can see no other route but anarchy, this is what I belive
> > > > to be inevitable. Anarchy can certianly produce all that you allude
> > > > to it, but really, do we not have all of that present at the moment in
> > > > the world?
>
> > > Dude! That was the last of my chain of events >"our present
> > > culture"................<SD
>
> > So we agree then?
>
> > > > As I have said I place great importance on tolerence, and
> > > > understanding for those with ways, and ideals that do not our own.
> > > > There will always be an 'Us and Them' mentality with the huamn race, I
> > > > just can't see any way out of that.
>
> > > There will "Always Be"? Really? Just because you can't see any way
> > > out doesn't mean there is no way out!! <<< SD
>
> > Come on mate. Context is king here, 'I can't see a way out' is
> > clearly me voiceing an opinion innit. So that must mean 'There will
> > always be...' is just my opinion.
>
> > > > So yes, tribalisation of like minded communities with acceptance and
> > > > understanding of those from other communities I see as the only viable
> > > > option.
>
> > > Contradictory? I thought there was no way out? <<SD
>
> > Seperate things. I can't see way out of this 'us and them menatlity',
> > and so the only viable option that I can see(opinion) is a gradual
> > tribalisation with enfasise on tolerance and understanding of those
> > from other 'tribes' Am I really that hard to understand SD?
>
> > > > Humanity is made up of almost countless indivduals, we as a specise
> > > > have many, many veried ways, of thought, of deed, of creed, of
> > > > expresion, and to my mind, this is what makes the world an exciting
> > > > and fun place to be. Indeed places like these would cese to be if we
> > > > all thought the same thing, are we hive minded creatures or
> > > > individuals, which would you rather be?
>
> > > > Rather than be saddend and dismayed at the thought of mankind not
> > > > being of one mind, I would be the same if we ever did think as one.
>
> > > You didn't say "being of one mind" previously but "mankind pulling
> > > together".........<<SD
>
> > Two interchangeable terms as far as I can see in the context of this
> > discusion. What would it take for mankind to pull together? I would
> > hazzard a guess at the whole of humanity being focused on the same
> > goal, or being of one mind.
>
> > Heh but come now Slip, no answering to my points, did you really only
> > get back to me to berate my debating style?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
