Yes, it is fran. Today many who pay a lot in taxes, not percentage
wise, but in amount based on a large income don't mind at all. Only a
select vocal few are heard in the media to the point that such
propaganda about the government being the problem (Ronnie)....has
become a common myth. I've said it many times...when I was a kid, my
father paid 91% of his income in taxes...and, we did VERY well....no
complaints. Today, in most cases, the poor pay a higher percentage of
their income in taxes than the rich. Robin Hood aside, this is absurd
no matter the argument.

On Feb 25, 9:28 am, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don's - of course - purely rhetorical suggestion about the non-payment
> of taxes seems to echo a certain US American mythology that there's
> something un-american about paying taxes, as well as there being
> something inherently suspect about (central) government.
>
> Nobody likes paying taxes and very few would even consider paying more
> than they absolutely have to - including me. But I must also
> acknowledge that taxation is the basic method for paying for things
> which a country/community/society feels need to be organised
> collectively. It belongs to the basic ideas of self-definition of a
> country/community/society to decide what these collective tasks are
> and how far they should be funded by the common purse.
>
> Even as a non-US American, I seem to remember that the rallying cry
> for the American Revolution was not, "No taxation," but rather "No
> taxation without representation." The USA established itself on this
> basis as a representative democracy. Everything else flows from that.
> To use the language of 18th Century political thinkers, that's the
> basic social contract and there's no way to opt out of it and back to
> the "state of nature." As far as I recall, the US fought a rather
> spectacular civil war about that very issue. Those who wanted the
> right to opt out lost.
>
> None of this, of course, addresses problems of injustice within
> particular taxation systems. But, strictly seen, that's what has to be
> sorted out within the representative democracy framework. Or, if your
> conscientious objections lead you to refuse, then you must accept the
> consequences. In my opinion, that's the kind of bravery Orn is talking
> about.
>
> Francis
>
> On 25 Feb., 16:50, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > First, since the US stopped being serious about tariffs, taxes are
> > needed for the common good. The IRS has been under-funded for years
> > and the result(s) is they only go after those accounts that will be
> > easy to collect. read: the accounts of the non-powerful/non-rich.
> > Our founding fathers not only decided not to continue to pay their
> > taxes, but they took action that would have resulted in their death if
> > caught. Almost to a man, they died in poverty. Few today are as brave.
>
> > On Feb 24, 6:41 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sure, the Duty of Civil Disobedience, good ole Thoreau. Truthfully,
> > > they already have the tax money, now it's people filing returns hoping
> > > to get something back from the forced prepay plan.  You can't get a
> > > job at any corporation if you tell them you will pay your own taxes
> > > from a 1099.  The IRS spends hundreds of thousands on paper alone plus
> > > millions on salaried collectors and yes men.
>
> > > On Feb 24, 7:05 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm against rioting in the streets but I'm all for civil disobedience.
> > > > If we en mass refused to pay federal taxes for last year I think we
> > > > might get Washington's attention.  Start simply by applying for
> > > > extensions and taking every legal route to delay paying right up until
> > > > the court order to pay and then just quietly say "No."
>
> > > > Whatta ya say gang?  Who's with me?
>
> > > > dj
>
> > > > Disclaimer:  Above suggestion is purely rhetorical and I have no
> > > > intention of disobeying the law or avoiding my fiscal obligation to my
> > > > country.  Nor am I aware of any group planning to do so.  All Hail
> > > > Obama!  His truth is shining on.
>
> > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > That's what we need to happen gruff, then the world will realize that
> > > > > we never really did need the bashstards (scot accent) and that we can
> > > > > "Grow Food" without them.  Banks are a system for the wealthy and that
> > > > > is why they are giving billions of dollars to the unscrupulous creeps
> > > > > that are throwing people out on the street instead of giving the money
> > > > > to the people who really need it.  It's protectionism for society's
> > > > > elite.  Are the banks lowering interest rates and refinancing? NO!!
> > > > > Illinois based Northern Trust just took $1.6 Billion dollars from the
> > > > > tax payers and went on a vacation jaunt in Southern California and
> > > > > hired the Band Chicago for $100,000, this all with Tax Payer Money.
> > > > > These people are spitting on us.  Tax breaks that are going to give a
> > > > > family an extra $65 a month is pathetic.  $600 to $1200 per family
> > > > > stimulus money is pathetic.  They should give everyone  $100,000 to
> > > > > stimulate the economy, but you see it's the economy of the rich that
> > > > > they want to stimulate.  There will be rioting in the streets even if
> > > > > the banks don't collapse because people are starting to realize what
> > > > > Schleps they are and how tied into the economic Slavery program they
> > > > > are.  Why should I give money to a bank that is throwing my friend out
> > > > > on the street when I could give the money to my friend instead?  To
> > > > > Hell with the Bashstards!!
>
> > > > > On Feb 23, 8:16 am, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> Banks, more than any other industry, can't be allowed to fail.
> > > > >> Financing and credit are so interwoven into the economies of all
> > > > >> nations that should the banks fail the entire economy would go
> > > > >> bust.    This may not be right but, as one talking head noted
> > > > >> yesterday on the tube, lending has almost become a utility just like
> > > > >> power and water.   If the banks are allowed to fail, I'm afraid
> > > > >> society and civilization as we know it will also fail.  Then there
> > > > >> will be rioting in the streets, for certain.
>
> > > > >> However, I agree that since the top four or five percent of the world
> > > > >> owns and controls forty or more percent of the wealth, they should be
> > > > >> called to account and to help.
>
> > > > >> On Feb 17, 3:27 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >> > I see people who have paid taxes for years being thrown out on the
> > > > >> > street by banks who are foreclosing on their homes while tax payer
> > > > >> > money is being doled out in billions to the same banks.  Who are 
> > > > >> > those
> > > > >> > people making millions of dollars every year taking tax payers 
> > > > >> > money.
> > > > >> > By what right do they have to use tax money for that purpose. What 
> > > > >> > is
> > > > >> > wrong with people in allowing this to go on?  Why doesn't the
> > > > >> > government use tax payer money to bring mortgages up to date and 
> > > > >> > order
> > > > >> > banks to refinance at a lower rate.   It wouldn't even cost one
> > > > >> > billion to keep families in their homes.   Where are the wealthy, 
> > > > >> > so
> > > > >> > called benefactors, Gates and Buffet in all of this?  Why shouldn't
> > > > >> > banks be allowed to fall just like others?  It seems they, the 
> > > > >> > upper
> > > > >> > echelon of society, still live in their own lofty worlds without a
> > > > >> > care for humanity.  What is wrong with them?  I predict a national
> > > > >> > breakdown in civility, a Ya Basta stance issued by the people.
> > > > >> > Rioting and looting and arch's political bloodletting ritual.- 
> > > > >> > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to