It must have been very difficult for you, orn, but you got it out.
I'm speechless.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
The wax poet,
Slip

On Apr 15, 9:44 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> "... the why of which is unknown...." - SD
>
> As poetic as your waxing is Slip...there does seem to be some actual
> knowledge about things human. Your self observation (there, I said it
> again) is a wonderful aspect of that process.
>
> On Apr 15, 7:28 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > When I suggest changing others purpose I don't mean by any physical,
> > verbal, dogmatic or other direct action which in essence is
> > forceful.   "They are we, we are them", is a concept beyond
> > physicality which retains the element of individuality, otherwise when
> > anyone makes purpose change, all else would automatically follow
> > suit.  Inspiring change makes more sense and represents the aspect I
> > was  implying with "change the purpose of others".  This as well is
> > the premise of many deity figures whether mono or polytheistic.  The
> > basic idea is to lead by example but the underlying problem is that
> > following en mass suggests gruff's religiosity which further leads to
> > religious persecution and aggressive tactic such as demonstrated by
> > religious fervor and insistence of adherence practiced by some
> > groups.
> > We are in agreement with introduction of path which allows realization
> > of self, the unfolding of same, and in addition the recognition of
> > shadow principle to enhance the fulfillment of personal potential and
> > development.   Outward expression of a fulfilled self is key in
> > relaying the change of purpose which may imply the quality of aura as
> > well which IF highly pervasive will have a great impact on change,
> > like the effluvium of a beautiful rose or perhaps your pheromones,
> > dear Molly. lol arf arf.
> > You are correct in perceiving change in purpose as most difficult and
> > complex.  Some simply cannot see the end of the road until the crash,
> > but as we know, one's willingness to learn relies heavily on one's
> > recognition of personal ignorance.  When confronting adversity in
> > others with suggestions of a more peaceful resolution, I'm often
> > receiving a retort with a Ghandi comparative.  Though still, it is
> > when some approaches asking why my grass is greener, I know I'm on the
> > path that is right for me and hopefully for  them.  We can feel it and
> > live it but it is the opposition that must take the initial step in
> > recognizing flawed self and questioning what might be wrong before
> > they can effect personal change in purpose.
> > On a global scale I doubt that effecting change is anything less than
> > a magnanimous task in light of the ongoing quest for materialistic
> > wealth fueled by greed and attained by corruption.  I oft sit and
> > ponder about having no government, no country or world with a resolve
> > that supports my most inner feeling of alienation and a sense of not
> > belonging here in a world that has become forlorn of truth.  Sometimes
> > I think my purpose is simply voyeurism of earthly activity and
> > conduct, the why of which is unknown.  If I could leave tomorrow, not
> > through death, I'd be gone.  I make the best of it and so better it is
> > for me but I would still rather be elsewhere with some very special
> > people who share purpose, together in Utopia, perhaps in that
> > parallel. Will you join me?
>
> > On Apr 15, 6:46 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > To effect change we must change the
> > > purpose of others,
>
> > > This, I think, is the most complicated and difficult path to change,
> > > as it establishes duality and opposition and not unity.  And yet, I do
> > > see it is the path most often taken.  What I see is: There are no
> > > others that do not include me.  We are them.  Change your purpose,
> > > change the world. Inspiring change may be as simple as connecting
> > > others to the beautiful.  Or introducing a path that allows the
> > > unfoldment of self and fulfillment of potential.  This inspiration is
> > > possible when you yourself can feel it and live from it.  Your
> > > expression then flows directly from the truth that connects us all.
>
> > > On Apr 15, 1:35 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I guess that is taking the ball and running with it, Molly.  I
> > > > wouldn't go so far as to concur with Blake and Goddard, though their
> > > > perspectives are well taken.  I still stand on the other side of the
> > > > fence with several issues presented while noting that my intent was to
> > > > open a closed door concerning the "possibilities" now available
> > > > through recognition of quantum parallel theorems.  Theirs is more of a
> > > > declaration and affirmation based on biblical reference, an intended
> > > > exclusion in my post.  I may have alluded to a supreme being but not
> > > > necessarily one that assumes the role or title of a god and all the
> > > > precepts of such.  Within our immediate cosmological realm I perceive
> > > > not a deity based world but one that is primarily based on our own
> > > > individual and group purpose; ergo, conflicts arise from the diversity
> > > > of individual and group purpose.  To effect change we must change the
> > > > purpose of others, which may be next to impossible but nevertheless
> > > > necessary to bring harmony to a world that has been embroiled in
> > > > perpetual turmoil throughout human history.  Change does not always
> > > > occur within a single generation, nor several generations, but humans
> > > > will strive in their vicissitude of human life experience to create a
> > > > peaceful world, individually and as a group. Hopefully, that will be
> > > > the collective purpose; a congruity of ideas.
>
> > > > On Apr 14, 9:36 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I agree to Slip's insight.  To it, I would add the insights of two of
> > > > > my favorite Christian Mystics, who wrote about the idea of imaginal
> > > > > consciousness:
>
> > > > > "I could tell you from now until the end of time that your own
> > > > > Wonderful Human Imagination is God, and you could hear it but never
> > > > > apply it. Quite often we cannot bring ourselves to apply it because it
> > > > > is in conflict with our training, but it does not operate itself, we
> > > > > are the operant power.
>
> > > > > We are told in the 118th Psalm, "The stone which the builders rejected
> > > > > has become the chief cornerstone.  This is the Lord's doing; it is
> > > > > marvelous in our sight."
>
> > > > > Many years ago, sitting in the silence, my eyes closed in
> > > > > contemplation but not really thinking of anyone partic¬ular thing, a
> > > > > huge quartz appeared before my eyes. Then it shattered, fragmenting
> > > > > itself into many, many pieces. As I watched, it quickly reassembled
> > > > > itself, but this time it took on the human form seated in the lotus
> > > > > posture. As I look¬ed, I realized I was looking at myself. Then it
> > > > > began to glow, and when it reached the intensity of the sun, it
> > > > > exploded and I awoke in my chair.
>
> > > > > The stone I had rejected was myself. I could not believe I, myself,
> > > > > was the cause of the phenomena of my life. I thought "he" did it,
> > > > > "she" did it, "they" did it . . . the world did it, but certainly I am
> > > > > not responsible. These things happened because of others, but I looked
> > > > > at the stone which the builders rejected. "It's the Lord's doing and
> > > > > it is marvelous in our sight."
>
> > > > > When we see this world as a world of appearance behind which the
> > > > > reality of imagining lies, we find the truth. All things exist in the
> > > > > human imagination, and by that I mean the individual's imagination. In
> > > > > your own bosom you bear your own heaven and your earth, and all that
> > > > > you behold, though it appears without, it is within, in your
> > > > > imagination, of which this world of mortality is the foundation stone.
> > > > > It is the tree. Christianity is its fulfill¬ment. It is the fruit, but
> > > > > the tree is Judaism, and all that it contains will come out,
> > > > > eventually, in a plan, a wonderful plan that was there in the
> > > > > beginning of time. That, we call Christianity.
>
> > > > > Blake said, "I know of no other Christianity and no other gospel than
> > > > > the liberty both of body and mind, to exercise the divine arts of
> > > > > imagination." Then he adds, "The apostles knew of no other gospel and
> > > > > the worship of God is using his gift." Then he states, "God became as
> > > > > we are, that we may be as he is."  What is the gift? Blake also
> > > > > mentions that. He said, "Man is imagination, and God is man and exists
> > > > > in us and we in him. The eternal body of man is the imagination and
> > > > > that is God Himself, the Divine Body, Jesus."  As you are seated here,
> > > > > it's all about you. Your own Wonderful Human Imagination is the God of
> > > > > the universe. That is the one spoken of as the Lord Jesus. Is it
> > > > > really true? You are called upon to test it and see.  I rejected the
> > > > > fact that I was the cause of the phenomenon of my life and thought
> > > > > everyone outside of myself caused it. Then I saw the vision. Here is a
> > > > > stone, a quartz, fragmented, then it came together in the shape of a
> > > > > man seated in the lotus posture. As I looked at it I saw that it was
> > > > > myself. Then I realized I was the cause. He is the dreamer in me. One
> > > > > day he is going to awake from this dream, and, when he awakes, I am he
> > > > > and he and I are One."
>
> > > > >  - Neville Goddard
>
> > > > > On Apr 14, 9:07 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > When considering theories of parallel universes one must consider 
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > life, of any form, may exist elsewhere.  With this consideration one
> > > > > > must rethink the concepts of purpose and of a supreme being, even 
> > > > > > one
> > > > > > that may have initiated the creation of our universe.  How is this?
> > > > > > Many, in the form of postulation deny
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to