I think the global warming fear wave is a load of crap...where is that
page?

On May 10, 9:01 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Internet needs a better search engine.  Otherwise one can end up
> on Chris' monstrous denial of global warming site whilst seeking
> tickets to a rugby league match between the elves and pixies.
>
> On 11 May, 01:52, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It's toooooo deeeeeep for meeeeee tooooonight, Molleeeeeeee
> > sweeeeeeetness,
>
> > On May 10, 10:59 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Found this article that might be of interest (http://mechape.blogspot.com/
> > > ):
>
> > > I'm eagerly waiting to see what kind of surprise is brewing under the
> > > guise of "computational knowledge engine" called Wolfram Alpha
> > > announced by Steven Wolfram in March and settled to debut in May.
> > > Steven Wolfram was widely credited for his Mathematica software
> > > package and equally criticized for the book "A New Kind of
> > > Science” ,abbreviated NKS , explained his new creation :
>
> > >     I had two crucial ingredients: Mathematica and NKS. With
> > > Mathematica, I had a symbolic language to represent anything—as well
> > > as the algorithmic power to do any kind of computation. And with NKS,
> > > I had a paradigm for understanding how all sorts of complexity could
> > > arise from simple rules.
>
> > >     But what about all the actual knowledge that we as humans have
> > > accumulated?
>
> > >     A lot of it is now on the web—in billions of pages of text. And
> > > with search engines, we can very efficiently search for specific terms
> > > and phrases in that text.
> > >     But we can’t compute from that. And in effect, we can only answer
> > > questions that have been literally asked before. We can look things
> > > up, but we can’t figure anything new out
>
> > > While many dubbed it like a potential Google killer I don't expect
> > > from Wolfram|Alpha to be used in mass on the Google scale. Essentially
> > > it is not a general searching tool, but is meant to become a tool for
> > > "truth discovery". But the truth is that most people are not looking
> > > for computable "truth discovery", they are sufficed with finding the
> > > facts and then using their own brains to accomodate that data to build
> > > their own knowledge base.
> > > I won't be as cynical as Ted Dziuba who wrote :
> > > "That sounds an awful lot like the marriage of some Python scripts
> > > with a few hundred bucks spent hiring third world workers through
> > > Amazon Mechanical Turk.".
>
> > > (A blog for the WA was launchedhttp://blog.wolframalpha.com/)
>
> > > Speaking of search engines and our latest global fever i tried Cuil
> > > (almost forgotten another Google-killer) to search for "swine flu" and
> > > i was kinda surprised. On the first page i found link pointing to one
> > > very good article describing 1976 swine flu case. And another link
> > > about recombination of birds and pigs flu virus genes, which dates
> > > from 2007, not exactly the last news as you might wrongly infer from
> > > the current media frenzy. If you had already encyclopedic info which
> > > you can find in Wikipedia those additional pieces are good hits and
> > > they are not easily found with general purpose search engines. What
> > > this is good for explaining knowledge ? When you have initial base you
> > > need the tools for finding more deep knowledge. And this is exactly
> > > what is lacking both in Wolfram Alpha project and even upcoming
> > > semantic web with all their ontologies. We don't have formal
> > > understanding what is "deep knowledge" which could also be adjusted
> > > according to the users needs.
>
> > > I think this reflects another leap in technology as extension of
> > > self.  What do YOU think?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to