Methinks you missed the meaning of what I said. People in denial do
that intentionally rather than face the knowledge being presented.
I do not need to study further to find that which I have found.
I do study you and everybody here, to learn how to progress.
I learn every day from every post that intends to deny me personally
for my method because they cannot confront the idea presented.

peace & Love

On May 15, 1:25 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Methinks and heartily believes he who announces they no longer have a
> need to learn is in the severest of all states of denial.
>
> On May 15, 3:46 am, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > fran! u seem a bit bothered in your last couple of posts...maybe a
> > vacation in the arctic would help u chill out a bit. i personally
> > havent read a book of significance in about 40 years because i also
> > found what i was looking for...this does not mean that one should not
> > put their views out there does it? maybe tink does what to spread his
> > light around...anything wrong with that? u can take what u want from
> > it, or not, no? speaking of conceited, at least he doesnt call himself
> > 'tinktheman' ;-^)
>
> > On May 15, 4:57 am, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On 15 Mai, 02:43, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I don't intend to say that the great works of a lot of people are not
> > > > great. I don't need to study anymore, I have found that which I was
> > > > seeking and am trying to go forward with it.
>
> > > This attitude makes discussion with you difficult, Tinker. If you are
> > > convinced you have found the Philosopher's Stone, then why do you
> > > enter into discourse with us here? Do you see any possibility of
> > > dialectical development in discussion with others? Is there a
> > > possibility that your views will develop and even change under the
> > > influence of the insights of others? If so, then I would see your
> > > dismissal of the need to study what others have written about many
> > > topics to be somewhat short-sighted. If not, then I have to conclude
> > > that your only purpose here is to enlighten those of us who haven't
> > > reached your elevated level of satori, or to indulge in mutual back-
> > > scratching with others who have achieved this exalted position.
>
> > > Such posts remind me of Lucy van Pelt, in Schulz's "Peanuts",
> > > following the motto, "I used to be conceited, but now I'm perfect."
>
> > > peace & Love
>
> > > Francis
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to